Anarcho Capitalism

Killing the cop in your head is not enough, you have to decolonize your head as well.

 

Well unpopular opnion here but I am actually in favor of Anarcho-capitalism. I would advocate for a stateless society where the means of production are privately owned and economic transactions are conducted within a free market. This ideology combines the principles of anarchism, which opposes compulsory government and seeks voluntary cooperation, with capitalism, which supports private property and free markets.

1. Private Ownership: Anarcho-capitalists argue that all means of production (land, factories, resources) should be privately owned. I believe that private ownership leads to more efficient and innovative use of resources compared to collective or state ownership.
   
   
2. Free Markets: They advocate for free markets where prices, production, and distribution of goods are determined by voluntary exchanges between individuals and businesses without government intervention. I see the free market as the best mechanism for allocating resources efficiently and meeting individual needs.
   
   
3. Wage Labour: In an anarcho-capitalist society, wage labor would still exist. Workers would sell their labor to employers in exchange for wages, and the terms of this exchange would be determined by mutual agreement between the worker and the employer.
   
   
4. Non-Aggression Principle: Anarcho-capitalists adhere to the non-aggression principle (NAP), which asserts that aggression (defined as the initiation of force or coercion against individuals or their property) is inherently illegitimate. All interactions should be voluntary and free from coercion.
   
   
5. Decentralization: Anarcho-capitalists prefer decentralized systems of governance. I envision a society where various services, including security, arbitration, and infrastructure, are provided by competing private enterprises rather than a centralized state.
   
   
6. Role of Property and Capital Owners: Decisions regarding the allocation of resources and the distribution of the product of labor are made by property and capital owners. This can lead to significant economic disparities, but anarcho-capitalists argue that this is a natural outcome of voluntary transactions in a free market.
   
   
7. Critique of State Intervention: Anarcho-capitalists are critical of state intervention in the economy. They argue that government actions, such as taxation, regulation, and redistribution, are forms of coercion that infringe on individual liberty and property rights.
   
   
8. Voluntaryism: They advocate for a society based on voluntary interactions and contracts. In this view, all forms of social organization, including business relationships, communities, and charities, should be formed through voluntary agreement rather than through coercive state mechanisms.

Anarcho-capitalism is a controversial and often criticized ideology. Critics argue that it can lead to significant inequalities and that the lack of a central authority might result in the exploitation of workers and the concentration of power in the hands of a few wealthy individuals. Proponents, however, believe that a truly free market, free from state intervention, would create a more prosperous and just society.
While not a perfect system because people can definitely get greedy but when coupled with Individualist Anarchist ideals such as personal accountability and individual freedom it is a decent idea at least. Read a book by Josiah Warren the first American anarchist called "The Practical Anarchist", he advocated for equitable commerce and the sovereignty of the individual. I think he does a better job of touching on the subject than I do for sure.
In essence it isn't a monetary system at all it's a "labor for labor" system. IE I fix your fridge, you bring me a deer, or rebuild my alternator, or create me a piece of art etc. As payment for my services and we agree on said services payment in advance. Wage labor can still exist, but not "I will pay you 7.25 an hour to cook hamburgers." It would be I need someone to cook hamburgers and I am offering 17$ an hour or something equal in trade for your time. You then can negotiate those terms, we meet on a agreement and a contract is made between both of us on common ground. It is far from exploitive IMO.

 

Uuuuuh, you cannot preach/advocate for anarcho-capitalism here, mate. Capitalism is a no-no for us. I mean I guess you can state your opinion but leave it at that.

 

Anarcho-Capitalism? More like a load of capitalist bullshit. What a joke. Doesn't do shit

 

Not to mention it's just neo-feudalism under a different name.

 

mate, this is only ancap bullshit, read Property Is Theft, please