Do feminazis exist ?

So I have been accused of being a “feminazi” numerous times by a certain member of this website. And I'm fuckign sick of it...so I decided to put all the evidence together, so ye could decide for yourself and not just judge me based on the angry insults of ONE member of a-p.net!

So Ungovernable says he has PROOF I am a “feminazi”. As an aside “feminazi” is a term often used by people who have absolutely no idea what feminism is about…but nonetheless let’s see does he actually have a point…As a Science student, I am very familiar with the term “proof”. To say you have proof of something means you have a vast amount of evidence, and to have evidence of something, you have to know what you are supplying the evidence for, in this case evidence for a “feminazi”…so what does a “feminazi” mean to Ungovernable?

Ok so apparently the SCUM Manifesto is exactly what feminazism is…So if I am a feminazi, that means I have to either BE the SCUM Manifesto (obviously impossible), have written the SCUM Manifesto…or at the very least, 100% support the SCUM manifesto.

He says I defend this text…let’s rewind back to see what I DID say regarding the SCUM Manifesto…

Hmmm…very interesting. Now this seems in direct contradiction to what Ungovernable is saying. That’s interesting…I wonder why that’s the case??
Maybe I’m missing something..maybe Ungovernable is referring to something else I said..

Yup, so because I called a post explaining the SCUM manifesto INTERESTING, this according to Ungovernable’s twisted logic means I defend the manifesto. Which means he now has PROOF I am feminazi.

You know what..I find various issues in patriarchy very interesting…does that mean I support patriarchy!?? I find serial killers very interesting…and as you know, I’m all for the reign of serial killers!

Anybody with any common sense knows that suggesting that somebody is defending something, because they find it “interesting”, makes no sense whatsoever.

On to the other reasons I am called a “feminazi”…

Anarchofem on feminism

Yup as you can see the above quote is a classic sign of somebody with VERY EXTREME views…You want people treated equally??? Omg….You’re a FEMINAZI!

Here is what I have to say regarding mainstream porn and women’s rights:

Yup…once again classic signs of a feminazi…notice the way feminazi’s support a woman’s choice to do what she pleases with her own body. Scandalous!!!

And to everybody who does not know why Ungovernable got pissed off with me :

Is it just me or does that sound like blatant hypocrisy?? Please please please correct me if i'm wrong...explaining of course how so.

Anyways, If everything above DOES sound like the mad rantings of a feminazi, then I would be very surprised if there aren’t plenty more feminazis in this forum. If it doesn’t…then Ungovernable is a ________.

 

Ungovernable...
I feel you are being somewhat disingenuous in yr attacks on user anarchofem.

The use of such terms as 'feminazi' do not illuminate anything whatsoever on gender relationships, nor do i feel anarchofem has posted in a manner that undermines the fight against patriarchy, nor towards the aim of establishing equal relationships between genders.

BTW, Yes, Solanas was transphobic, as is ppl like Sheila Jeffries and her followers.

whilst i'm really fucked off with user Anarchofem about her comments that NGNM85's comments were NOT racist, I hardly feel it smart nor constructive to start a thread (lets face it) directly aimed at undermining her credibility. She is not a feminazi (nor is yr use of the term at all appropriate), she just has some shit ideas about what constitutes racism, thats it.

 

Seriously, let's cut this bullshit, AnarchoFem has said previously and after I PMed her to confirm this that she is not a feminazi nor does she support the SCUM manifesto and this is what she replied:

I think that wraps it up, otherwise calling her a feminazi would be the same as calling some random guy a nazi just because you feel like it. And I doubt this means that AnarchoFem is defending the SCUM manifesto at all, she only agrees to a view/clarification of the SCUM manifesto, not support the SCUM manifesto:

Do you attack everyone that goes against your views/decision in some way or another? Seriously.

 

By saying your interested in something doesn't mean you support it. Example I am interested in Nazi's in WW2, I do not support Nazi's but I find it interesting how Germany got to that point, how Hitler worked, why they did things they did etc. Hopefully you get what I am saying, being interested in something doesn't necessarily mean you support it.

 

Hmm maybe, but could the person be interested in it because they wonder how they could think like that? Or interested in it because it was so ridiculous that is amazes them how that person could support mein kampf? If that doesn't make any sense, just say so and I will try and decrypt my own words haha

 

This is probably the worst thread I've read on the internet in a long while, and I post on some martial arts boards... I guess some people need no proof to accuse somebody other than that somebody not sharing their point of view, this is beyond pointless...

 

all i know is went out with a feminist who threatened to castrate me if i ever said anything remotely sexist all while she went on and on about how men are inferior and think with their penises so yeah...they exist in my book.

 

Well, I not seen this thread before. I gave you your chance, you blew it. Bye.

 

good riddance.

 

Of course "feminazis" exist. Almost every subculture/movement has a strict sect like that.

 

The Scum manifesto is SHIT! Equal rights for all!

 

I'm not going to comment on the Ungovernable/Anarchofem debate as it's, like, 8 or so months old and I don't want to beat a dead horse (or any horse for that matter).

I always thought "feminazi" was a derrogatory term sexist people used against feminists in general. At least that's the way I'd always heard it used by certain skinheads and kids in chatrooms.

I read something about the SCUM manifesto a few years back. I honestly thought it was a spoof or joke or something and never thought about it again until this reminded me. Do you mean to tell me there's people out there that follow that?

 

Yes there are, and in my book sexism is sexism, regardless of what gender it emanates from. Of course it goes without saying that the scales tip heavily against the male side of things, but that doesn't justify sexism against all males either.

 

This.

I used to be on of those "kill whitey" types of people, that were really just out against the ruling party/ gender/ race, etc. but later you realize there are minorities that feel their race is best, there are feminists that feel their gender is better. It all infringes on social equality, and doesn't make sense, Equality is equality. I'll fight the rich christian white male every day, but say poor islamist black women came into some sort of political power, attempting to subdue those that aren't like them regardless of something they can't control, I'll fight that power too.