Loading...
Welcome to Anarcho-Punk.net community ! Please register or login to participate in the forums.   Ⓐ//Ⓔ

re-mastered "The feeding of the 5,000" out now

Discussion in 'Music, punk scene & subcultures' started by ungovernable, Aug 16, 2010.

  1. raindeer667

    raindeer667 Experienced Member Experienced member Forum Member


    170

    0

    0

    Oct 10, 2009
     
    someone post it on anarcho-punk...
     
  2. manvsmaritoni

    manvsmaritoni Active Member Forum Member


    37

    0

    0

    Mar 12, 2010
     
    what a fucking joke. i love crass dearly, but what a fucking joke.
     
  3. ungovernable

    ungovernable Autonome Staff Member Uploader Admin Team Experienced member


    4,425

    121

    24

    Aug 21, 2009
    Male
    Canada  Canada
    yeah i'd still be curious to hear how it sound. anyone got the album ? i ain't going to buy it for that price.

    greatest working class rip off, oi oi oi !
     
  4. KAAOS-82

    KAAOS-82 Experienced Member Uploader Experienced member Forum Member


    590

    1

    16

    Jul 13, 2010
     
    Its really not that hard finding the originals on vinyl so unless your a completest collector i see no reason why people should bother purchasing them.
     
  5. Marzz

    Marzz Experienced Member Experienced member


    63

    0

    0

    Apr 27, 2010
     

    I have searched all the record stores in my area and have to yet too find any Crass on vinyl. Believe me, I would love to have Crass in my vinyl collection =P.
     
  6. gerard

    gerard New Member New Member


    3

    0

    0

    Sep 17, 2009
     
    Hi folks,

    I hope you don't mind me poking my nose in, but I've just been reading this thread & I think some of the above could do with a little counter-balance...

    I'm not sure where any of the posters here live or how they make a living, but if I may take you back to the late 70s in the UK, what Crass did was sell their own records very cheaply. As they stated at the time, this was because they lived very cheaply (in what some might call privelege and all can call Dial House) and they wanted to share the profits gained from living cheaply by making the records cheap. It was also great marketing, whether that was the intention or not.

    First point: "Crass never made any money when it was alive"...

    Sorry but that's nonsense - Crass made a lot of money from their record sales - they then ploughed it into the Crass Records business, which (in my opinion) was the start of the rot.

    2) "and when they made money they gave it to charity."

    Gigs, yes, you're right. Bu I think you're in danger of turning human beings into Jesus-substitutes here. The humans who made up Crass also had to eat / pay petrol to get to gigs / buy their tobacco etc They lived in a privileged situation (Dial House) that, incidentally, couldn't be replicated in the UK in the time they were a band and they shared the benefits of that. It wasn't possible to replicate that then and nor is it now - seeing as most of Crass no longer share that privilege, it's a tad harsh to expect them to continue to paste 'pay no more than' - remember, that was always a (noble, but still) bourgouise luxury.

    3) "Crass should have stood dead instead of turning it into a money-making-machine."

    Again, I'd say that's a bit harsh, but more importantly , if Crass had stood dead (as you wish in your post) , they would be feeding you with unobtainable myths, which in the end could only harm you.

    I think what worries me here is the implication that artists shouldn't be allowed to make a living from their art - that to do so somehow implies "sell out" (and anyone who uses that phrase should be forced to declare their own method of surviving, and for how long, in capital letters).

    Would you really have forced Van Gogh into collecting litter instead of painting? Warhol into a call center instead of prancing around the Factory?

    I hope I don't come across as confrontational, I just wanted to paint some of the colour background into what I thought was a pretty black and white opinion of the situation.

    Penny & Gee still enjoy the privilege of living at (the now owned) Dial House - everyone else (who was) in Crass has to fend for themselves. They don't live in some parallel universe that pays their rent or gets constant benefit gig offers.

    If you really want a world without full-time artists - if all art must be reduced in importance to have to be done in peoples' spare time, if art is to be reduced to that level of importance - I'll make no subscription to your paradise....
     
  7. gerard

    gerard New Member New Member


    3

    0

    0

    Sep 17, 2009
     
  8. ungovernable

    ungovernable Autonome Staff Member Uploader Admin Team Experienced member


    4,425

    121

    24

    Aug 21, 2009
    Male
    Canada  Canada
    Oh so now just because the are embourgeoised and dont want to "live cheaply" anymore this is a legitimate argument to justify selling out anarchy and making profits out of something that was meant to be absolutly no-profit ? Anyway, crass is dead now so they should stick to their ideas back when crass was alive, or else it really doesnt makes any sense....

    they never said the only reason why they dont want to make profit for themselves out of crass was only because they live cheaply. they said that it's because crass was meant to be a band to help "the cause" and not their personnal profit.

    I was talking about personnal profit. I don't care if a band makes money and invest it in good cause, this is exactly how things should be. Especially if they write "dont pay more than 3$ on their album. There was no problem with the old crass back in the days, but there is a problem with half of the band selling albums for 10 times the price it used to be, without the support of many members.

    Sorry but it is stated multiple times in crass interviews and biographies that they never made profit for themselves out of crass. it's a fact.


    This is a stupid argument, i hear this bullshit all the time from the mouth of sellout bands. PUNK IS NOT A FUCKING JOB. BEING AN ANARCHIST IS NOT A JOB. I agree that bands should be auto-sufficent and make enough money to pay their recordings, gas, tours, etc... but if you want to live out of it then thats fucking selling out
    Man, crass was dead 30 years ago and now you are talking like they should still be allowed to live out of what they did 30 years ago, this is non-sense. If they need money then just get a job and stop selling out anarchism and punk

    Hey man, because i built anarcho-punk.net i suppose i should be allowed to live out of it ??? And if i don't live in a squat 20 years later, i should still be allowed to make money out of anarcho-punk.net, even if the website disseapear and doesn't exist anymore ??? THIS IS A FUCKING JOKE

    Oh ok, so like i said, i suppose you're not going to worry if i make a living out of anarcho-punk.net, maybe i should also start making profit over anarcho-punk.net t-shirts for the next 30 years while selling out anarchism ??

    Crass was NEVER MEANT to be a full time job for their members, crass was never about making a living out of it. They sold out indeed, they betrayed their ideals

    What's worse than selling out and making a living our of a band ? Selling out and making a living out of a DEAD BAND SINCE OVER 30 YEARS. They aren't even working for their money, they arent doing tours, gigs, etc.... It's as worse as a boss making profit over other's work or a proprietary making money out of someone paying his appartment while he sit on his lazy ass and doing nothing. Capitalism in its purest form : making profit without working.

    i'll repeat once again that it's crass themselves who chosen this way of life, but now that they became famous they are betraying their ideas and they decide to make a living out of their past works

    Activism is not a fucking job. And yes i want to live in a world where activists stand up because they want to fight for something they believe in, and they don,t care about making no money out of it, just like someone who goes to a protest doesnt want to be paid for fighting for what he believe in.... In this world we will see who really want to fight by CONVICTIONS, and we will see those who want to be anarchist just to be famous and make money.

    Oh yeah right, changing the world by releasing one single prisonner... Sorry but i'm not a favoritist, i fight for the liberation of everyone, it's not because someone is an anarchist or a punk that he's more special, even if i agree he should be free.

    Plus they have a businessman attitude, lying to us and pretending that most of the money goes into printing CD, which is totally false, i proved that the production prices are VERY LOW.
     
  9. nodz

    nodz Experienced Member Experienced member Forum Member


    328

    0

    5

    Apr 4, 2010
     
    Must admit I did a costing on CD production and it is low, providing you already have the gear and don't have to invest in computer and printer.
    100 cds - $20, $20 printer cartridge where you get 100 CDs printed and 200 covers, jewel case 10 for $2, card stock $1.60 and you get 10 out of it. So to make a CD it's 20 cents for CD, 16 cents for card, 20 cents for case, 66 cents for CD and cover to be printed (provided black and white production). A total of $1.22 excluding energy to run computer to duplicate CD from digital file and print discs/covers.

    Cost to record a CD these days has also drastically reduced. I have a guitar $200, recording/mixing software with many plug-ins free (including drums, effects, bass, synthesizers ets), recording interface $129, computer to run everything $271. Total cost of a full studio - $600, the initial cost is high but the more tracks that are recorded, the cheaper it becomes. If I sold my CD for AUS $5 then break even revenue (if only 1 album produced) is $600 divided by 1 - (cost per unit/sell price per unit) breakeven revenue is thus 600 / (1 - (1.22/5)) which is $793, over simplified yes because I haven't included energy overheads, my time to record, mix and produce etc. My break even units is fixed costs / unit contribution, which is 600 / (5-1.22) = 158 units. I would have to sell 158 CDs at $5 to cover all my costs, including studio set up, anything after that is profit.

    Overheads of a record label such as EMI are of course much higher because, many studio hours + engineers + producers + music videos - cover design artists etc but from the above it can be seen that selling 100,000 units at $25 / unit (gold record status) is way over break even or even earning reasonable margin in a capitalist society and they are clearly profiteering.
     
  10. Protspecd

    Protspecd Experienced Member Experienced member Forum Member


    466

    0

    0

    Mar 3, 2010
     
    Even if they were to make some kind of a living out of the music they create, at least create new music. If they wanted more money, at least create more music rather than just reissue old cd's.
     
  11. ungovernable

    ungovernable Autonome Staff Member Uploader Admin Team Experienced member


    4,425

    121

    24

    Aug 21, 2009
    Male
    Canada  Canada
    nodz, crass releases aren't DIY, it's professional pressing and it's very cheap.

    http://www.cd-cartes.com/pressage-cd-12cm,fr,3,36.cfm

    This company we are using are pressing cd for 0.29 euros each cd and we are talking about only 500 exemplaries. Crass will probably release over 20,000 exemplaries so it's WAY cheaper for them. There is no way in hell to justify the high price of their new release. Back in the days they were selling cd for 3$ and they were STILL making profit (and donating it to charity). If they kept the same prices i wouldnt even care that they make profit since the sale price would be reasonnable. But seriously... 20 bucks for an album that used to be 3 bucks 30 years ago... WHAT THE FUCK ????

    lets say they pay like between 0.30 euros and 0.50 euros (0.24 GBP)for each cd including everything.... they would be still making profits if they sell it for the price it used to be (3 GBP). That's still 2,75 GBP of profit PER CD.... They are planning to re-issue like 5 albums that are like best-sellers hit in the punk scene.... let's say they will sell 50,000 albums (probably more since crass is very well known and they will sell albums for the next 30 years again)....
    Well that's still 125,000 GBP fucking profit !!!! pretty fucking good for no work at all since the band isn't even alive anymore ???? no ???

    but nooo they are going to sell it for 15 GBP, so if they sell 50,000 albums that's nearly one fucking million of pouds of profit. Cost pretty much to pay for the living of an anarchist punk that used to live in squat and not ask for much eh ????

    Seriously stop taking them in pity guys, they already bought themselves a fucking house (dial house) from playing music, what more do the punk scene owe them ??? oh yeah right, we owe them a living ?? of course we do !!





    Yes that's right, crass is dead
    It's just another collector record for the consumers head
    Bubblegum rock on plastic transistors
    Schoolboy sedition backed by big time promoters
    record industry promote crass
    Ain't for revolution, it's just for cash
    Anarcho-Punk became a fashion just like hippy used to be
    Ain't got a thing to do with your or me
    Business is system and systems kill
    Business is expressions of the public will
    Anarcho-Punk became a mbusiness cos we all felt lost
    Crass sold out and now we all pay the cost
    Punk narcissism was a social napalm
    Steve Jones started doing real harm
    Preaching revolution, anarchy and change
    Sucked from the system that had given him his name
    Well I'm tired of staring through shit stained glass
    Tired of staring up a superstars arse

    I've got an arse and crap and a name
    I'm just waiting for my fifteen minutes fame
    Steven Ignorant, you're napalm
    If you're so anarchist, why do you sell out?
    Penny Rimbaud, you're napalm, your write with your hand
    But it's Rimbaud's arm
    And me, yes, I, do I want to burn?
    Is there something I can learn?
    Do I need a re-issue edition to make a living of
    Can I resist the carrots that fame and fortune dangle
    I see the velvet zippies in their bondage gear
    The anarchist social elite with safetypins in their ear
    I watch and understand that it don't mean a thing
    The scorpions might attack, but the systems stole the sting
    CRASS IS DEAD. CRASS IS DEAD. CRASS IS DEAD.
     
  12. Anxiety69

    Anxiety69 Experienced Member Uploader Experienced member Forum Member


    2,341

    8

    156

    Oct 18, 2009
    Male , 46 years old
    Long Beach CA  United States
    Funny, when i had the pleasure of meeting G vaucher 10 years ago this was the last thing she told me :)
     
  13. nodz

    nodz Experienced Member Experienced member Forum Member


    328

    0

    5

    Apr 4, 2010
     
    Agreed. That is a professional outfit that would have set up equipment already. Cost is about one third what I quoted (0.29E is about 45 cents) and that was a rough costing of what it would cost me (a non-professional) to do.

    I of course was also quoting cost of a scratch album and not one that was being reissued, the costs have already been recouped/absorbed and as I said, they are clearly profiteering.
     
  14. punkmar77

    punkmar77 Experienced Member Uploader Experienced member


    5,737

    204

    718

    Nov 13, 2009
     United States
    How utterly condescending of you to assume that people on here don't do more than listen to music, later when you dismount your high-horse you might want to re-think that statement....
     
  15. gerard

    gerard New Member New Member


    3

    0

    0

    Sep 17, 2009
     
    Yes, you're right - I apologise for that presumption. I guess I just got a bit worked up about how worked up people get about something as (relatively) unimportant as a music scene. Gary is a friend of mine - the simple choice is to help or not. It certainly won't stop you fighting for the rights of other prisoners.

    Regarding Crass, I thought there might be some decent conversation to be had here, but it would appear not - instead I've just been told, quite aggressively, how wrong I am... so I won't be bothering you again.

    In defence of the Crass members though, I would like to point out that - ungovernable - you've misunderstood what I meant about Dial House - my point was that Crass lived a priveleged existence *when they were going*, not now. Now most of the band members have left Dial House and don't enjoy that privelege. My source for the original 'sharing' thing was Penny Rimbaud in a radio interview
    with Capital Radio (London) around the time of Penis Envy.

    Regarding this: "Sorry but it is stated multiple times in crass interviews and biographies that they never made profit for themselves out of crass. it's a fact."

    The band paid themselves £500 a year each - a ridiculously small amount when spread out into 52 weeks of course. I'm not sure which biographies you're referring to as the only ones I'm aware of are written by Penny Rimbaud and me (under the name George Berger).

    I didn't come here for an argument so I'll leave you to it. I think we're coming from very different tangents. I wish you all the best in your endeavours & more power to your elbow in your efforts to make the world a better place.
     
  16. ungovernable

    ungovernable Autonome Staff Member Uploader Admin Team Experienced member


    4,425

    121

    24

    Aug 21, 2009
    Male
    Canada  Canada
    Looks like you don't know what to answer. i have stated way enough arguments, proofs, and numbers. You just refuse to critize your anarchist heroes. I have big respect for everything crass have done and i always thought that it's exactly how a DIY anarchist band should be, but now this have changed and i can't deny the fact that they are not what they used to be anymore.

    I don't remember having read that anywhere (about the 500 GBP per year) but like you said it's a ridiculously small amount and nothing like what they are doing today with the re-issue of old records just to make money. And like i said, all biographies and interviews of crass i have read said that they were giving away all the profit to charity. I'm pretty sure even the official biography on southern records is talking about it, but the last time i read it was many years ago....

    Anyway, the point is still that crass is not what it used to be anymore, and they shouldnt be making a living over 30-years-old material and a dead band, thats as worse as the capitalist proprietaries who make a living over the people who pay their appartment, it's making profit over something when you're not even working for it. Considering it's anarchist stuff, it's even worse.

    i'll not repeat myself, i have clearly explained my point in my last 2 posts.
     
  17. ungovernable

    ungovernable Autonome Staff Member Uploader Admin Team Experienced member


    4,425

    121

    24

    Aug 21, 2009
    Male
    Canada  Canada
    lol Steve Ignorant is playing a gig soon for £14 each tickets, and he say on facebook we shouldnt moan about it because people pay £40 for a playstation game, and he say that gigs are hard to organize, what a fucking joke....

    Also noticed crass are now selling their old albums for £5.00 for a DIGITAL DOWNLOAD, what a rip off...
    used to be "pay no more than £3.00 for a real record" now it's "pay at least £5.00 for a shitty digital download"

    seriously they have totally ruined what crass used to be
     
  18. vAsSiLy77

    vAsSiLy77 Experienced Member Uploader Experienced member Forum Member


    1,816

    2

    15

    Jun 21, 2010
     
    i wonder how they deal with the "pay no more than..." prints from the original covers on the reissues, i searched a bit around but it looks like the new edition isn't sold in germany.

    i am reading gerards/george bergers "the story of Crass" translated to german - i found it in the university library.
    it's true, he wrote about the 500 pound per year and it is something to remember- but this buisness thing now... right: it leaves a bad feeling.
     
  19. ungovernable

    ungovernable Autonome Staff Member Uploader Admin Team Experienced member


    4,425

    121

    24

    Aug 21, 2009
    Male
    Canada  Canada
    they removed it.

    what a shame. they put this print to avoid that thieves make illegitimate profit over anarcho-punk music but they ended up stealing from themselves and breaking their own rules....
     
  20. Mindriot

    Mindriot Member New Member


    6

    0

    0

    Sep 22, 2010
     United Kingdom
    I wasnt going to lower myself and reply to this but all of you are bitching about Crass (mainly Ungovernable ), yet few if any of you (1 person from france) ever saw Crass or lived in the UK during Crass heyday and feel you have a right to slag Crass off because they destroyed your precious memories of one of the best punk bands of all time. I also bet that none of you are old enough to have seen them. I saw Crass on many occaisions and although i never visited Dial House, i know i still can if i want to to have a chat with Penny or Gee. Thats the way it was and is - open house policy - how many of you so called anarchists have an open house policy where you live - if you turned up to Dial House you can have a chat, make tea, cook dinner, stay the night and all from the kindness shown by Penny and Gee.

    You slag off the remasters, yet how many of you have a copy?? I have and its a superb piece of work and well worth every penny of the 12 quid i payed for it - yes i paid for it and why shouldnt i.
    33 tracks totally remastered, a massive booket, a miniture version of the original sleeve and nicely packaged too - not just to make it re-sellable - this is justified - a superb piece of work. If this remaster had been released back in the day it would have made all other punk albums irrelevant - its that good, not stopped playing it since i got it and feeding isnt one of my fave crass albums either (Stations and Penis envy are).
    And to all of you who bought the original CD when it was reissued - bet you didnt know that was remastered too did ya - yet you still went out and bought it.
    And stop bitching about the cost of Cd,s too - how mant of you on minimum wage?? Oh you work do you?? How very anarchist of you. Do any of you know the amount of CDs online you need to sell just to make minimum wage?? Heres a link with the breakdown - and its in dollars too http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/2 ... rn-online/
    So as you can see, just to make minimum wage every month you would need to sell 1161 retail albums per month at high value return just to make that minimum wage. You would still have to sell over 143 per month of a self pressed album to make the same.
    Most of the cash from the sale of this goes to make the next one (same as always with Crass) and part goes to Southern Studios to keep it alive. And don't bitch about Southern either - NO SOUTHERN - NO CRASS RECORDS or many other bands records for that matter.
    Someone said on here that none of Crass have gone out and played the rounds with a band since Crass - I beg to differ - Steve sung for Conflict for a while as well as Stafford Mercenaries and Shwarzaneggar and is touring with his band at the moment doing Crass songs as well as his own, which he has the perfect right to do. Penny has written books, Gee has been producing Art, they have both been performing plays under the Crass banner when they want to but you wouldnt know this coz youve not done your research

    Next bit - How come they dont sell their albums as cheaply as they used to - coz its nearly 30 years later dumbass.

    I used an online calculator to find the difference in worth of £2 (pay no more than on feeding) in 1979 to how much £2 would be now and here are the results
    £7.54 using the retail price index
    £7.47 using the GDP deflator
    £12.00 using the average earnings
    £12.80 using the per capita GDP
    £14.00 using the share of GDP

    As you can see a normal vinyl release done properly which ALL of Crass records originally were - (bet you didnt moan about that at the time bet you didnt say why dont they just release it on tape its cheaper - vinyl isnt very anarchist is it - no you didnt, you paid the money - so fuck off) would set you back a minimum of £7 now and as i said before this CD package is superb and well worth the £12 quid i paid for it which as you can see is average earnings based on 2 quid from 1979 - so shut the fuck up and realise that pay no more than 2 quid then is roughly equivalent to pay no more than 12 quid now which is what the album is selling for . But then Penny etc have paid out money for the studio time to remaster these which you seem to have forgotten about and the cost of getting them pressed and the covers done all of which costs as does some distribution (and as Alison pointed out it cost £6 to make each one). Dont tell me it doesnt coz i know it does - even if you send them off yourself you still have to buy all the packaging first and the postage and get a bus into town every day to post em - soon mounts up dont it - but then you will walk coz taking a bus isnt very narchist is it - giving money to a corporation for giving you a ride - get a fucking bike.

    So stop whining like a bitch and spend 12 quid on this - and no im not uploading it - you dont desrerve it

    so selling it for 2 quid is really stupid in this day and age - like most of your arguement seem to be - you dont live here, im assuming you never saw Crass or were involved in anything that went on in England in the early 80's and you seem to use anarchism as a way to vent your anger at people who have something reasonable to say - you already fucked off hte bloke who helped write the Crass book - do you know more than him - bet ya dont - bet your one of those anarchist peace punks who knows shit and just spouts rhetoric whenever theyre losing an arguement

    Anarchist Peace Punk - What a Fucking joke.

    And dont bother with one of your smart assed and ill informed replies coz you use the internet mate - corporate bollox and not very anarchist is it - go and produce a fanzine and hawk it round every concievable gig just to get your message ascross - bet you aint done that either - Crass did - i have - and this was before you could spout bollox to whoever has an opinion on the interent - there was no internet or mobiles back in the 80's - yet still people were more informed than you are.
    Real fucking idiots
     
Loading...