• Anarchopunk albums: 2500 • International albums: 1255 • Total downloads: 3755
|
Click here to register an account on the forums
by mymarkx on 04/03/2012, 07:27
If you don't want someone living in your body for nine months, don't fucking put them there, it aint rocket science.
Very few women do. One of my daughters did, being a lesbian and wanting a kid, but even in that case it was the doctor, who happened to be male, who "put it there." In more than 99% of pregnancies, the person who "puts it there" is not the mother. If males don't want females to have abortions, they should stop putting it there. Over population and world food shortage, right, I'm sure that's what's foremost in the mind of every woman that aborts.
I don't think that's in the "mind" of a one-celled amoeba either. I think they have some kind of automatic trip circuit, so that when there's a shortage of anything vital in their environment, such as sunlight, water, air, nutrients, etc., the circuit trips and they all just stop reproducing. That's only in some kinds of amoebae, the ecologically viable species, but not in the nonviable types. So it shouldn't be that difficult to isolate, and then we just genetically modify all males. That way it wouldn't matter if the cause of the shortage was overpopulation, inequitable distribution of plentiful resources, or anything else. Whenever something was in short supply, males would just stop putting it there and females wouldn't need abortions. It's such an obvious solution that I have to think that the trip-circuit factor has already been isolated, patented, and suppressed, like anything else that could lower profit margins in a capitalist society.
"For my own part, I have always reproached the políticos for standing in the elections because that was tantamount to wiping out the potential for revolution in economic, political and social terms or, in other words, destroying the very basis of the revolution." --José Peirats, The CNT in the Spanish Revolution, Vol. 1.

mymarkx
-
-
• Posts: 110
-
• View member's uploaded albums
-
- Joined: 09/01/2012, 07:51
- Location: San Diego
Add to friends
-
by Bentheanarchist on 04/03/2012, 13:08
Fucking pro-lifers! 99.9 percent Of pro-lifers are men. Personally, I approve birth control as a better alternative than abortion but I still believe women have the right to have an abortion. Abortion can save can be very useful and what if the women is raped, or a pregnant teenager not ready to have children or if they simply dont want children. It should be up to the pregnant female not the male. Pro-lifers when say they hate abortion or birth control it means they hate women. Pro-life Is the stanch of the church which controls the people to not revolt or insurrect. They don't want regular women to be able to control their reproduction so they can control their children in factories for wage slavery. I got that example from Alexander Berkman's The Blast.
If it had not been for these things, I might have lived out my life talking at street corners to scorning men. I might have died, unmarked, unknown, a failure. Now we are not a failure. This is our career and our triumph. Never in our full life could we hope to do such work for tolerance, for justice, for man's understanding of man as now we do by accident. Our words — our lives — our pains — nothing! The taking of our lives — lives of a good shoemaker and a poor fish-peddler — all! That last moment belongs to us — that agony is our triumph - Bartolomeo Vanzetti
Bentheanarchist
-
-
• Posts: 941
-
• View member's uploaded albums
-
- Joined: 10/12/2010, 23:51
- Location: Aledo TX
Add to friends
-
by Canis latrans on 04/03/2012, 14:06
butcher wrote:I'm saying poverty is, like, imposed, and production is geared towards accumulating capital not satisfying the needs of people (although they do occasionally correlate). That there is widespread hunger and poverty has fuck all to do with there being 'too many people', instead it has everything to do with social relations.
Well duh, but that does not preclude the fact that are in fact too many people on this planet. I'm saying one thing and you thinking I am saying another, when in fact the thing you are saying is something I agree with but not the same thing I am saying.

Canis latrans
-
-
• Posts: 43
-
• View member's uploaded albums
-
- Joined: 26/02/2012, 14:42
- Location: Unknown
Add to friends
by mymarkx on 04/03/2012, 14:31
if a lettuce leaf could speak, what would it say?
Look a head.
"For my own part, I have always reproached the políticos for standing in the elections because that was tantamount to wiping out the potential for revolution in economic, political and social terms or, in other words, destroying the very basis of the revolution." --José Peirats, The CNT in the Spanish Revolution, Vol. 1.

mymarkx
-
-
• Posts: 110
-
• View member's uploaded albums
-
- Joined: 09/01/2012, 07:51
- Location: San Diego
Add to friends
-
by Bentheanarchist on 04/03/2012, 15:08
Canis latrans wrote:butcher wrote:I'm saying poverty is, like, imposed, and production is geared towards accumulating capital not satisfying the needs of people (although they do occasionally correlate). That there is widespread hunger and poverty has fuck all to do with there being 'too many people', instead it has everything to do with social relations.
Well duh, but that does not preclude the fact that are in fact too many people on this planet. I'm saying one thing and you thinking I am saying another, when in fact the thing you are saying is something I agree with but not the same thing I am saying.
There arent to many people on the planet; there is enough resources to go around. People who believe this idea support eugenics.
If it had not been for these things, I might have lived out my life talking at street corners to scorning men. I might have died, unmarked, unknown, a failure. Now we are not a failure. This is our career and our triumph. Never in our full life could we hope to do such work for tolerance, for justice, for man's understanding of man as now we do by accident. Our words — our lives — our pains — nothing! The taking of our lives — lives of a good shoemaker and a poor fish-peddler — all! That last moment belongs to us — that agony is our triumph - Bartolomeo Vanzetti
Bentheanarchist
-
-
• Posts: 941
-
• View member's uploaded albums
-
- Joined: 10/12/2010, 23:51
- Location: Aledo TX
Add to friends
-
by Canis latrans on 04/03/2012, 15:26
Bentheanarchist wrote:Canis latrans wrote:butcher wrote:I'm saying poverty is, like, imposed, and production is geared towards accumulating capital not satisfying the needs of people (although they do occasionally correlate). That there is widespread hunger and poverty has fuck all to do with there being 'too many people', instead it has everything to do with social relations.
Well duh, but that does not preclude the fact that are in fact too many people on this planet. I'm saying one thing and you thinking I am saying another, when in fact the thing you are saying is something I agree with but not the same thing I am saying.
There arent to many people on the planet; there is enough resources to go around. People who believe this idea support eugenics.
So because I say the Earth is over population I support eugenics? gee thanks. So how many people can the Earth support?

Canis latrans
-
-
• Posts: 43
-
• View member's uploaded albums
-
- Joined: 26/02/2012, 14:42
- Location: Unknown
Add to friends
by Bentheanarchist on 04/03/2012, 15:32
Canis latrans wrote:Bentheanarchist wrote:Canis latrans wrote:butcher wrote:I'm saying poverty is, like, imposed, and production is geared towards accumulating capital not satisfying the needs of people (although they do occasionally correlate). That there is widespread hunger and poverty has fuck all to do with there being 'too many people', instead it has everything to do with social relations.
Well duh, but that does not preclude the fact that are in fact too many people on this planet. I'm saying one thing and you thinking I am saying another, when in fact the thing you are saying is something I agree with but not the same thing I am saying.
There arent to many people on the planet; there is enough resources to go around. People who believe this idea support eugenics.
So because I say the Earth is over population I support eugenics? gee thanks. So how many people can the Earth support?
Infinite, as it has for thousands of years. Eugenics is the only way to lower population or exterminating them. hmmmm, kill the poor people. Get less population. 
If it had not been for these things, I might have lived out my life talking at street corners to scorning men. I might have died, unmarked, unknown, a failure. Now we are not a failure. This is our career and our triumph. Never in our full life could we hope to do such work for tolerance, for justice, for man's understanding of man as now we do by accident. Our words — our lives — our pains — nothing! The taking of our lives — lives of a good shoemaker and a poor fish-peddler — all! That last moment belongs to us — that agony is our triumph - Bartolomeo Vanzetti
Bentheanarchist
-
-
• Posts: 941
-
• View member's uploaded albums
-
- Joined: 10/12/2010, 23:51
- Location: Aledo TX
Add to friends
-
by Canis latrans on 04/03/2012, 15:35
Bentheanarchist wrote:Canis latrans wrote:Bentheanarchist wrote:Canis latrans wrote:butcher wrote:I'm saying poverty is, like, imposed, and production is geared towards accumulating capital not satisfying the needs of people (although they do occasionally correlate). That there is widespread hunger and poverty has fuck all to do with there being 'too many people', instead it has everything to do with social relations.
Well duh, but that does not preclude the fact that are in fact too many people on this planet. I'm saying one thing and you thinking I am saying another, when in fact the thing you are saying is something I agree with but not the same thing I am saying.
There arent to many people on the planet; there is enough resources to go around. People who believe this idea support eugenics.
So because I say the Earth is over population I support eugenics? gee thanks. So how many people can the Earth support?
Infinite, as it has for thousands of years. Eugenics is the only way to lower population or exterminating them. hmmmm, kill the poor people. Get less population. 
So how much living space do you think all these infinite people on a finite planet will have?

Canis latrans
-
-
• Posts: 43
-
• View member's uploaded albums
-
- Joined: 26/02/2012, 14:42
- Location: Unknown
Add to friends
by Bentheanarchist on 04/03/2012, 15:38
the population will always be stable because people die every day and people are born every day. It is Stable. You know what? We wll never run out of living spaces. They will always be available in the vast amount of spaces and resources on this planet.
If it had not been for these things, I might have lived out my life talking at street corners to scorning men. I might have died, unmarked, unknown, a failure. Now we are not a failure. This is our career and our triumph. Never in our full life could we hope to do such work for tolerance, for justice, for man's understanding of man as now we do by accident. Our words — our lives — our pains — nothing! The taking of our lives — lives of a good shoemaker and a poor fish-peddler — all! That last moment belongs to us — that agony is our triumph - Bartolomeo Vanzetti
Bentheanarchist
-
-
• Posts: 941
-
• View member's uploaded albums
-
- Joined: 10/12/2010, 23:51
- Location: Aledo TX
Add to friends
-
by punkmar77 on 04/03/2012, 15:49
Bentheanarchist wrote:the population will always be stable because people die every day and people are born every day. It is Stable. You know what? We wll never run out of living spaces. They will always be available in the vast amount of spaces and resources on this planet.
Sorry Ben but this is daft, sure there will always be space for humans but what about every other living thing on earth...fuck them right? Razing ecosystems to sustain 7 billion humans is fucking taking it's toll, how many precious native species are wiped out every year to feed cattle in the Amazons? Vast does not mean endless, and the freedom to have 18 kids is not freedom for all.

punkmar77
-
-
• Posts: 4673
-
• View member's uploaded albums
-
- Joined: 13/11/2009, 17:57
- Location: Tijuana + San Diego
Add to friends
by Canis latrans on 04/03/2012, 15:52
Bentheanarchist wrote:the population will always be stable because people die every day and people are born every day. It is Stable. You know what? We wll never run out of living spaces. They will always be available in the vast amount of spaces and resources on this planet.
Um, the only way the population is stable is if the same number of people die every year as are born every year. Do you think that in 1000 AD there were over 9 billion people alive on the planet?

Canis latrans
-
-
• Posts: 43
-
• View member's uploaded albums
-
- Joined: 26/02/2012, 14:42
- Location: Unknown
Add to friends
by Nigel on 04/03/2012, 16:42
Bentheanarchist wrote:the population will always be stable because people die every day and people are born every day. It is Stable. You know what? We wll never run out of living spaces. They will always be available in the vast amount of spaces and resources on this planet.
Wait... you think the population is stable? Where do you get that idea from? http://assets.knowledge.allianz.com/img ... _19821.jpg
“I’m guessing it was January 2007, a meeting in Bethesda, we got a bag of bees and just started smashing them on the desk,” Charles Wick said. “It was very complicated.”

Nigel
-
-
• Posts: 24
-
• View member's uploaded albums
-
- Joined: 26/02/2012, 14:24
- Location: Portland
Add to friends
by Nergal on 04/03/2012, 16:49
Bentheanarchist wrote:Canis latrans wrote:butcher wrote:I'm saying poverty is, like, imposed, and production is geared towards accumulating capital not satisfying the needs of people (although they do occasionally correlate). That there is widespread hunger and poverty has fuck all to do with there being 'too many people', instead it has everything to do with social relations.
Well duh, but that does not preclude the fact that are in fact too many people on this planet. I'm saying one thing and you thinking I am saying another, when in fact the thing you are saying is something I agree with but not the same thing I am saying.
There arent to many people on the planet; there is enough resources to go around. People who believe this idea support eugenics.
I thought you'd be interested in this info aswell. "The Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime" http://pricetheory.uchicago.edu/levitt/ ... ed2001.pdf- Code: Select all
Women who have abortions are those most at risk to give birth to children who would engage in criminal activity. Teenagers, unmarried women, and the economically disadvantaged are all substantially more likely to seek abortions [Levine et al. 1996]. Recent studies have found children born to these mothers to be at higher risk for committing crime in adolescence

Nergal
-
-
• Posts: 8
-
• View member's uploaded albums
-
- Joined: 02/11/2010, 23:39
- Location: Southern California
Add to friends
-
by Canis latrans on 04/03/2012, 17:03
Nergal wrote:Bentheanarchist wrote:Canis latrans wrote:butcher wrote:I'm saying poverty is, like, imposed, and production is geared towards accumulating capital not satisfying the needs of people (although they do occasionally correlate). That there is widespread hunger and poverty has fuck all to do with there being 'too many people', instead it has everything to do with social relations.
Well duh, but that does not preclude the fact that are in fact too many people on this planet. I'm saying one thing and you thinking I am saying another, when in fact the thing you are saying is something I agree with but not the same thing I am saying.
There arent to many people on the planet; there is enough resources to go around. People who believe this idea support eugenics.
I thought you'd be interested in this info aswell. "The Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime" http://pricetheory.uchicago.edu/levitt/ ... ed2001.pdf- Code: Select all
Women who have abortions are those most at risk to give birth to children who would engage in criminal activity. Teenagers, unmarried women, and the economically disadvantaged are all substantially more likely to seek abortions [Levine et al. 1996]. Recent studies have found children born to these mothers to be at higher risk for committing crime in adolescence
Oh but didn't you know? Crime is caused by capitalism. If there were no capitalism, and everyone shared everything equally there would be no crime. By supporting abortion, contraceptives and negative population growth you are also supporting eugenics and capitalism. /sarcasm

Canis latrans
-
-
• Posts: 43
-
• View member's uploaded albums
-
- Joined: 26/02/2012, 14:42
- Location: Unknown
Add to friends
by Bentheanarchist on 04/03/2012, 18:25
Well what the hell are we going the do about the population? KILL THEM ALL! THATS INSANE!
If it had not been for these things, I might have lived out my life talking at street corners to scorning men. I might have died, unmarked, unknown, a failure. Now we are not a failure. This is our career and our triumph. Never in our full life could we hope to do such work for tolerance, for justice, for man's understanding of man as now we do by accident. Our words — our lives — our pains — nothing! The taking of our lives — lives of a good shoemaker and a poor fish-peddler — all! That last moment belongs to us — that agony is our triumph - Bartolomeo Vanzetti
Bentheanarchist
-
-
• Posts: 941
-
• View member's uploaded albums
-
- Joined: 10/12/2010, 23:51
- Location: Aledo TX
Add to friends
-
by Bentheanarchist on 04/03/2012, 18:36
punkmar77 wrote:Bentheanarchist wrote:the population will always be stable because people die every day and people are born every day. It is Stable. You know what? We wll never run out of living spaces. They will always be available in the vast amount of spaces and resources on this planet.
Sorry Ben but this is daft, sure there will always be space for humans but what about every other living thing on earth...fuck them right? Razing ecosystems to sustain 7 billion humans is fucking taking it's toll, how many precious native species are wiped out every year to feed cattle in the Amazons? Vast does not mean endless, and the freedom to have 18 kids is not freedom for all.
The cattle shouldnt be in the rainforest in the first place. people dont need to eat meet with the vast amount of vegatables, fruit, nuts, and starches.
If it had not been for these things, I might have lived out my life talking at street corners to scorning men. I might have died, unmarked, unknown, a failure. Now we are not a failure. This is our career and our triumph. Never in our full life could we hope to do such work for tolerance, for justice, for man's understanding of man as now we do by accident. Our words — our lives — our pains — nothing! The taking of our lives — lives of a good shoemaker and a poor fish-peddler — all! That last moment belongs to us — that agony is our triumph - Bartolomeo Vanzetti
Bentheanarchist
-
-
• Posts: 941
-
• View member's uploaded albums
-
- Joined: 10/12/2010, 23:51
- Location: Aledo TX
Add to friends
-
by Bentheanarchist on 04/03/2012, 18:43
Capitalism is the reason for starvation and shortages because all the capitalists are keeping it for themselves to make profit on and alot of people cant afford to by the food to eat.
If it had not been for these things, I might have lived out my life talking at street corners to scorning men. I might have died, unmarked, unknown, a failure. Now we are not a failure. This is our career and our triumph. Never in our full life could we hope to do such work for tolerance, for justice, for man's understanding of man as now we do by accident. Our words — our lives — our pains — nothing! The taking of our lives — lives of a good shoemaker and a poor fish-peddler — all! That last moment belongs to us — that agony is our triumph - Bartolomeo Vanzetti
Bentheanarchist
-
-
• Posts: 941
-
• View member's uploaded albums
-
- Joined: 10/12/2010, 23:51
- Location: Aledo TX
Add to friends
-
by Bentheanarchist on 04/03/2012, 18:46
Canis latrans wrote:Nergal wrote:Bentheanarchist wrote:Canis latrans wrote:butcher wrote:I'm saying poverty is, like, imposed, and production is geared towards accumulating capital not satisfying the needs of people (although they do occasionally correlate). That there is widespread hunger and poverty has fuck all to do with there being 'too many people', instead it has everything to do with social relations.
Well duh, but that does not preclude the fact that are in fact too many people on this planet. I'm saying one thing and you thinking I am saying another, when in fact the thing you are saying is something I agree with but not the same thing I am saying.
There arent to many people on the planet; there is enough resources to go around. People who believe this idea support eugenics.
I thought you'd be interested in this info aswell. "The Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime" http://pricetheory.uchicago.edu/levitt/ ... ed2001.pdf- Code: Select all
Women who have abortions are those most at risk to give birth to children who would engage in criminal activity. Teenagers, unmarried women, and the economically disadvantaged are all substantially more likely to seek abortions [Levine et al. 1996]. Recent studies have found children born to these mothers to be at higher risk for committing crime in adolescence
Oh but didn't you know? Crime is caused by capitalism. If there were no capitalism, and everyone shared everything equally there would be no crime. By supporting abortion, contraceptives and negative population growth you are also supporting eugenics and capitalism. /sarcasm
no offence, but that article is stupid. Crime is caused by Capitalism not overpopulation.
If it had not been for these things, I might have lived out my life talking at street corners to scorning men. I might have died, unmarked, unknown, a failure. Now we are not a failure. This is our career and our triumph. Never in our full life could we hope to do such work for tolerance, for justice, for man's understanding of man as now we do by accident. Our words — our lives — our pains — nothing! The taking of our lives — lives of a good shoemaker and a poor fish-peddler — all! That last moment belongs to us — that agony is our triumph - Bartolomeo Vanzetti
Bentheanarchist
-
-
• Posts: 941
-
• View member's uploaded albums
-
- Joined: 10/12/2010, 23:51
- Location: Aledo TX
Add to friends
-
by Nigel on 04/03/2012, 18:59
Bentheanarchist wrote:Well what the hell are we going the do about the population? KILL THEM ALL! THATS INSANE!
Why would you have to kill people? What a silly thing to say. When people are educated and have enough food/shelter/amenities, they have fewer children. This is a well-known effect of having a higher quality of life. Therefore the answer would seem to lie in forming healthier societies where resources are distributed more equally. When wealth is distributed more equally and education is accessible to everyone, the population will begin to decline and eventually stabilize, resulting in an even higher quality of life.
“I’m guessing it was January 2007, a meeting in Bethesda, we got a bag of bees and just started smashing them on the desk,” Charles Wick said. “It was very complicated.”

Nigel
-
-
• Posts: 24
-
• View member's uploaded albums
-
- Joined: 26/02/2012, 14:24
- Location: Portland
Add to friends
Similar topics
Return to Anarchism and radical activism
Users browsing this forum: HeadingForHell and 24 guests
|
|
|